Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
BA Must Not Be Allowed To Block Liberalisation...  
User currently offlineILS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1095 times:

bmi insists the European Commission must bring ‘illegal’ UK / US regulations to an end - British Airways must not be allowed to block liberalisation and hold consumers to ransom


bmi british midland is to ask the European Commission (EC) to immediately investigate the UK government for its continued support for anti-consumer regulation of flights between London Heathrow and the US.

The Bermuda II Treaty grants a “club” of four airlines – British Airways, Virgin Atlantic, American Airlines and United Airlines – exclusive access to Heathrow-US routes, allowing them to decide frequencies and fare prices. All other airlines are prevented from flying Heathrow-US routes.

bmi believes that these regulations are in clear breach of European Union (EU) competition law and is confident that the EC will support bmi’s attempts to introduce more competition.

The bmi action has been precipitated by the government’s decision to abandon aviation talks with the US government. These were due to start on Monday 28 January, but the Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions pulled out without consultation on Friday 25 January, almost as soon as British Airways and American Airlines announced they were abandoning their alliance.

bmi firmly rejects the view that liberalisation between the UK and US cannot be achieved, simply because British Airways and American Airlines appear to have pulled out of their own deal.

At the moment the government is allowing British Airways to effectively veto any new agreement. British Airways must not be allowed to hold governments, other airlines and – most importantly – consumers to ransom, withholding its support until it has the perfect commercial deal for its shareholders.

British Airways left the public sector for the private sector 15 years ago, but the government seems intent on mollycoddling the airline. While the rest of British industry has to quite rightly operate in their markets without government protection from fair competition, British Airways is being treated like a state-owned airline and being allowed to dictate an aviation policy to the government.

The special rights and privileges granted British Airways – and Virgin Atlantic – under the Bermuda II Treaty are tantamount to state assistance. Failure to deregulate Heathrow–US routes is letting these two airlines generate artificially high revenue at the expense of fair competition, lower fares, consumer choice and the national and local economy around Heathrow.

Sir Michael Bishop, chairman of bmi british midland said:

“The government must not meekly give up on liberalisation just because British Airways and American Airlines have walked away from their alliance. Benefits for the consumer are too important to be overridden by the commercial interests of airlines. There is still an agreement to be reached and we call upon the UK and US governments to make rapid progress as a matter of urgency.

Liberalisation of Heathrow-US routes is overdue. The Bermuda II Treaty is anti-consumer and, we believe, against the law. It is time to put consumers first and stop protecting BA and Virgin Atlantic from the level of competition that the rest of British industry has to contend with every day of the year.”



17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTwa902fly From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 3048 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1059 times:

Air India flies LHR-ORD and you can buy tickets from Chicago to Heathrow and back on Air India. So wouldn't that make a club of 5?

TWA902


life wasn't worth the balance, or the crumpled paper it was written on
User currently offlineArsenal@LHR From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 7791 posts, RR: 23
Reply 2, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1048 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Make that a club of 6. Kuwait airways flies LHR-JFK-LHR 3 times a week, but that is not much of a competition is it? BA is holding a lot of people at ransom.

Arsenal@LHR


In Arsene we trust!!
User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 12715 posts, RR: 80
Reply 3, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1034 times:

The cheek of the EU sometimes, who really mollycoddled their state airlines until very recently. BA was pushing for a more open market within Europe from the late 1980's, when most of the EU flag carriers were getting regular and huge state cash injections.
The UK goverment have not done BA any real favours, look how VS got those LHR slots in the early 90's.
As for BMI, two words: 'Star Alliance'.
BMI could not have got where they are now in any other EU nation.
As for Bermuda 2, when will BA, and other UK airlines, get the right to fly internally within the US, as US carriers can within the EU?





User currently offline2cn From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 648 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1012 times:

Europe is not one country- so comparing flying internally in Europe to flying domestically in the US is like comparing apples to oranges. It also has nothing to do with flying into LHR.

User currently offlineBlueShamu330s From UK - England, joined Sep 2001, 2515 posts, RR: 25
Reply 5, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 993 times:

ILS, if you're going to reprint an article or statement, you have to credit the publisher/author for it; otherwise you are infringing copyright law.


So I drive a 4x4. So what?! Tax the a$$ off me for it...oh, you already have... :-(
User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6659 posts, RR: 23
Reply 6, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 991 times:

Europe is not one country- so comparing flying internally in Europe to flying domestically in the US is like comparing apples to oranges. It also has nothing to do with flying into LHR.

Flying within most of Europe is affectively flying within 1 country due to the 'open' market of the EU.

User currently offlineRacko From Germany, joined Nov 2001, 4838 posts, RR: 21
Reply 7, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 978 times:

i really hope that they open LHR for more airlines...

Delta, United, American, Northwest, USAir, Continental and Lufthansa all fly from FRA to the USA, that's competition ...

User currently offlineLucifer From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 106 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 969 times:

It is not treated as one country yet Donder, as at the moment, US airlines can come to the Uk and fly on to Europe, picking up passengers/cargo/whatever, whereas in the US, EU airlines are unable to do so: this is as the EU is not yet treated as one contry, so US airlines are able to gain fifth freedom rights.

User currently offlineLowfareair From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 962 times:

How much ya wanna bet that he'd be fine with all this gouging he's mad at if only bmi was allowed into LHR-US, making it a club of 5?

User currently offlineBobnwa From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 5986 posts, RR: 9
Reply 10, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 954 times:

ILS,

Did you really write that? Are those your own words? I would bet not.

User currently offlineAir Malta From Malta, joined Sep 2001, 2365 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 930 times:

BA must block liberalisation as long as the BA/AA deal is not sorted out... I don't know why they are blocking such an alliance while LH and UA enjoy monopoly at FRA, KL/NW at AMS and AF/DL at CDG ... so let BA do its business as anyone else... I'm fed up with all these antitrust immunities which seem to applicable to every allaince but AA/BA... so no way to the Liberalisation until a good deal is found....


Next flights : BRU-ZRH-CAI (LX)/ BRU-FCO-TLV (AZ)
User currently offlineRacko From Germany, joined Nov 2001, 4838 posts, RR: 21
Reply 12, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 915 times:

air Malta, LH/UA have no monopoly at FRA.
Delta, United, American, Northwest, USAir, Continental and Lufthansa - all these airlines fly FRA <-> USA

User currently offlineILS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 908 times:

This is from BMI's website.

User currently offlineG-CIVP From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 1209 posts, RR: 10
Reply 14, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 904 times:

"Europe is not one country- so comparing flying internally in Europe to flying domestically in the US is like comparing apples to oranges. It also has nothing to do with flying into LHR."

The problem is the Americans like the free market but on their terms. The point GDB is trying to make is if USA carriers want more access to LHR, then theres got to be a reasonable quid pro quo re the American market.



User currently offlineAussiestu From Australia, joined Mar 2001, 778 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 883 times:

Why is BMI suddenly trying to get Bemuda II sorted and going to the EU to complain? Because they want to fly longhaul from LHR and cant. Where was BMI before when this was all 'anti competitive'. They were not interested because BMI did not fly longhaul and was not part of the star alliance. Bit late now BMI, perhaps we should let them work it out, if and when they do.

User currently onlineOA412 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 4981 posts, RR: 25
Reply 16, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 874 times:

UA/LH, AF/DL, and NW/KL are entirely different animals for one very important reason: Open-Skies. You see no American (or German, Dutch, or French airline for that matter) are prevented from setting up services from CDG, AMS, or FRA to the US and v.v. On the other hand, other than BA, AA, UA, and VS all British and US carriers are prevented from offering LHR-US flights. Until, LHR is opened to new and meaningful competition, AA/BA should not be approved.


Hughes Airwest - Top Banana In The West
User currently offline2cn From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 648 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 867 times:

The problem is the Americans like the free market but on their terms. The point GDB is trying to make is if USA carriers want more access to LHR, then theres got to be a reasonable quid pro quo re the American market.


How is flying domestically in the US compareable to flying internationaly into LHR???

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Should The Mentally Ill Be Allowed To Fly? posted Fri Dec 9 2005 00:51:18 by Hmmmm...
Would The Embraer 170 Be Allowed To Land At LCY? posted Sat Aug 20 2005 13:56:35 by Dsa
Should Branson Be Allowed To Start Virgin America? posted Fri Feb 13 2004 07:04:46 by Rjpieces
Should Bankrupt Carriers Be Allowed To Operate? posted Sat Jan 10 2004 20:22:25 by Matt D
How Can An Aircraft Like This Be Allowed To Fly? posted Wed Jul 3 2002 07:44:51 by TR
Should Passengers Be Allowed To Smoke/Drink? posted Mon Apr 30 2001 10:31:32 by LAX
Should AeroAsia Be Allowed To Expand Intl. Routes? posted Sun Apr 22 2001 06:07:00 by GOOFY
BA Connect To Be Sold To Flybe posted Fri Nov 3 2006 08:47:12 by TristarSteve
AZ: Not Allowed To Bid For Volare posted Mon Jan 30 2006 23:30:42 by Scotron11
Mobile Phones To Be Allowed In Airplanes :( posted Sun Jul 3 2005 19:44:43 by TheSonntag