Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
KLM Loads From YYC To AMS  
User currently offlinePlanecrazy777 From Canada, joined Feb 2009, 7 posts, RR: 0
Posted (4 years 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 5031 times:

Anyone have information on how KLM is doing on the YYC to AMS route? Wondering if they will be cancelling the route in the fall.

26 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineFlyb From Canada, joined Aug 2006, 631 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (4 years 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 5002 times:

From what I heard at YYC two weeks ago, KLM is impressed by the loads and there is no consideration of pulling out of YYC and the Alberta market, especially once they can start pulling passengers from the YEG market this fall.

User currently offlineFlyyul From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 4934 posts, RR: 53
Reply 2, posted (4 years 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 5004 times:

Loads have been soft .. as per daily tracking of amadeus.net where KLM somehow publishes the number of pax on board in their flight status section.

Normal for a start-up to have this general softness, will improve over time no doubt,

User currently offlineJMO-777 From Germany, joined Apr 2002, 498 posts, RR: 18
Reply 3, posted (4 years 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 4706 times:

Hello,

slightly off-topic but still concerning KLM and loads.

Which routes are the Top5 (number of passengers, longhaul flights) of KLM?

Thanks for information.

Viele Gruesse,
Jan


~~~ Fly with a Triple Seven and you feel like in heaven ~~~
User currently offlineBobnwa From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 6027 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (4 years 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 4676 times:



Quoting Flyb (Reply 1):
From what I heard at YYC two weeks ago, KLM is impressed by the loads



Quoting Flyb (Reply 1):
Loads have been soft .. as per daily tracking of amadeus.net

Seems we have conflicting opinions here. YYC-AMS is part of the NW/KL joint venture and other than a very few people at NW/KL know how the loads are, and they do not release the info.

User currently offlineCityofathens From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (4 years 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 4587 times:

To what extent is calgary's oil traffic dependent on oil prices? I ask because I remember reading an article in The Economist (or similar) that stated that extracting oil from Alberta's tar sands was not cheap; on a related question, what other significant industries make use of YYC's connections to Europe? Is it mainly oil?

I ask because BA started off with a 4-class 777 and we are now down to a 3-class 767.

Rgds

User currently offlineFlyyul From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 4934 posts, RR: 53
Reply 6, posted (4 years 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 4562 times:



Quoting Bobnwa (Reply 4):
Seems we have conflicting opinions here. YYC-AMS is part of the NW/KL joint venture and other than a very few people at NW/KL know how the loads are, and they do not release the info.

Go to amadeus.net

Look at the status of the flight..it will show you how many people were on board.

User currently offlineHawaiian763 From Canada, joined May 2009, 240 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (4 years 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 4524 times:

Do you think if the loads improve would KLM consider maybe upgrading their aircraft to something larger like the 77W or if really lucky a 744?

User currently offlineFlyb From Canada, joined Aug 2006, 631 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (4 years 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 4363 times:



Quoting Bobnwa (Reply 4):
Quoting Flyb (Reply 1):
From what I heard at YYC two weeks ago, KLM is impressed by the loads



Quoting Flyb (Reply 1):
Loads have been soft .. as per daily tracking of amadeus.net

Seems we have conflicting opinions here. YYC-AMS is part of the NW/KL joint venture and other than a very few people at NW/KL know how the loads are, and they do not release the info.

Not a conflict actually, KLM is happy with the loads they are strong for a new route is what they are stating. Again I think WS and KLM will help loads this fall.

User currently offlineBobnwa From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 6027 posts, RR: 9
Reply 9, posted (4 years 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 4339 times:



Quoting Flyb (Reply 8):
Not a conflict actually, KLM is happy with the loads they are strong for a new route is what they are stating.

Where is KLM stating this?

Quoting Flyyul (Reply 6):
Go to amadeus.net

Look at the status of the flight..it will show you how many people were on board.

Maybe it is me, but I am unable to come up passengers on board through Amadeus. Are you saying that Amadeus.net can do this for all departures from any airport or just YYC.

User currently offlineFlyyul From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 4934 posts, RR: 53
Reply 10, posted (4 years 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 4333 times:

* Departing Amsterdam, Netherlands - Schiphol - Tuesday, June 16, 2009
* Arriving Calgary, Canada - Calgary International - Tuesday, June 16, 2009
* Airline KLM Royal Dutch Airlines (KL) Flight number 677(KL677)

Hour Flight Information Airport
15:20 Estimated time of departure Amsterdam, Netherlands - Schiphol
15:18 Left the gate Amsterdam, Netherlands - Schiphol
15:37 Took off Amsterdam, Netherlands - Schiphol
Px passengers on board 219) Amsterdam, Netherlands - Schiphol
16:16 Estimated time of arrival Calgary, Canada - Calgary International

User currently offlineMEA-707 From Netherlands, joined Nov 1999, 4124 posts, RR: 37
Reply 11, posted (4 years 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 4278 times:

don't forget KLM is always relatively clever with yield management pricing to get their planes full, but that doesn't mean they make a profit on it. Probably it needs a year or two to mature. They had some nice offers for Calgary left and right (they often showed up as cheapest option searching Europe-Calgary and v.v.) and also advertize a lot in Alberta.
Their clear website booking engine also takes care that the pax spread out based on either the lowest price or best date. So usually their planes have a decent loadfactor.
Last week I flew on an Air Canada 77W from YYZ to LHR with only about 60 people on board, that would never happen on KLM.


nobody has ever died from hard work, but why take the risk?
User currently offlineFlyyul From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 4934 posts, RR: 53
Reply 12, posted (4 years 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 4249 times:



Quoting MEA-707 (Reply 11):
Last week I flew on an Air Canada 77W from YYZ to LHR with only about 60 people on board, that would never happen on KLM.

Oh really? So when KLM left with 77 pax last week - their revenue management team let them down?

User currently offlineEvolv From Canada, joined exactly 6 years ago today! , 86 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (4 years 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 4140 times:



Quoting Flyyul (Reply 10):

That is a 86-87% load factor, i thought that would be solid for any flight...

I heard through the grapevine that once the agreement with westjet comes into effect they will switch to 777 for the YYC route

User currently offlineFlyyul From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 4934 posts, RR: 53
Reply 14, posted (4 years 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 4117 times:



Quoting Evolv (Reply 13):

That is a 86-87% load factor, i thought that would be solid for any flight...

I heard through the grapevine that once the agreement with westjet comes into effect they will switch to 777 for the YYC route

Yes - but May was horrible....I mean horrible. (LF under 50%)

User currently offlineEVA777SEA From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 469 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (4 years 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 3984 times:



Quoting Evolv (Reply 13):
That is a 86-87% load factor, i thought that would be solid for any flight...

I heard through the grapevine that once the agreement with westjet comes into effect they will switch to 777 for the YYC route

Huh? 77 out of 251 = 86-87%? Am I missing something?

And if LF in may is really under 50%, then it would not even be remotely possible that the flight would be upgraded to a 772, which holds 327 pax.

User currently offlineDanielb From Canada, joined May 2009, 56 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (4 years 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 3973 times:



Quoting Evolv (Reply 13):
That is a 86-87% load factor, i thought that would be solid for any flight...

Which agreement with Westjet? Somebody fill me in on this.

Quoting Flyb (Reply 1):
especially once they can start pulling passengers from the YEG market this fall.

Is this because AC will be going back to only 3 x weekly?? WHat did you mean by this??

Thanks,

Danielb.

User currently offlineBobnwa From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 6027 posts, RR: 9
Reply 17, posted (4 years 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 3928 times:



Quoting Flyyul (Reply 10):
Hour Flight Information Airport
15:20 Estimated time of departure Amsterdam, Netherlands - Schiphol
15:18 Left the gate Amsterdam, Netherlands - Schiphol
15:37 Took off Amsterdam, Netherlands - Schiphol
Px passengers on board 219) Amsterdam, Netherlands - Schiphol
16:16 Estimated time of arrival Calgary, Canada - Calgary International

The KL computer shows 212 passengers. 12C and 200Y.

User currently offlineMEA-707 From Netherlands, joined Nov 1999, 4124 posts, RR: 37
Reply 18, posted (4 years 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 3889 times:



Quoting Flyyul (Reply 12):
Oh really? So when KLM left with 77 pax last week - their revenue management team let them down?

As you mentioned yourself, new routes have to get started, also because of lacking the return sectors of the passengers either way. I meant, in general a high load factor doesn't have to say KLM is making a profit on it as they usually seem to fill up their planes, not always and not on each and every route though obviously. Of course YYC isn't doing great yet.


nobody has ever died from hard work, but why take the risk?
User currently offlineFlyyul From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 4934 posts, RR: 53
Reply 19, posted (4 years 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 3889 times:

Crew of 7? or 7 non-revs?

User currently offlineEvolv From Canada, joined exactly 6 years ago today! , 86 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (4 years 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 3702 times:



Quoting EVA777SEA (Reply 15):


Quoting Evolv (Reply 13):
That is a 86-87% load factor, i thought that would be solid for any flight...

I heard through the grapevine that once the agreement with westjet comes into effect they will switch to 777 for the YYC route

Huh? 77 out of 251 = 86-87%? Am I missing something?

And if LF in may is really under 50%, then it would not even be remotely possible that the flight would be upgraded to a 772, which holds 327 pax.

Ya i was referring to the stats Flyyul posted

User currently offlineEvolv From Canada, joined exactly 6 years ago today! , 86 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (4 years 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 3696 times:



Quoting Flyyul (Reply 14):
Yes - but May was horrible....I mean horrible. (LF under 50%)

Yes but this probably has a lot to do with it being the first month of operation

User currently offlineFlyb From Canada, joined Aug 2006, 631 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (4 years 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 3671 times:



Quoting Danielb (Reply 16):
Quoting Flyb (Reply 1):
especially once they can start pulling passengers from the YEG market this fall.

Is this because AC will be going back to only 3 x weekly?? WHat did you mean by this??

Thanks,

Danielb.

Nothing to do with AC operations, WS hub in YYC and codeshare.

User currently offlineFlyyul From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 4934 posts, RR: 53
Reply 23, posted (4 years 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3357 times:

Only 137 inbound today on KL..anyway - totally normal for a start-up route

User currently offlinePnwtraveler From Canada, joined Jun 2007, 2054 posts, RR: 12
Reply 24, posted (4 years 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3346 times:

KLM last year had a 747 and a 777 for their two flights from YYZ. This year it is a 747 and an A330. We know loads are down across the board for many airlines, so this year is not a good judge of normal loads. So it will be interesting tto see as the economy rebounds how the YYC market responds.

25 DALCA: Anybody have any idea of the LH loads? Could be that KL and LH are competing for the same pax load.
26 CityofAthens: I would imagine so, as both offer many connections via Europe to points east and south.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Travelling From YYC To BOS Via YYZ (question...) posted Mon Jun 25 2007 18:19:20 by Vio
NW From Boston To Ams Aircraft Change posted Sat Jun 10 2006 19:13:50 by KL565
DL Loads From Florida To Other SE Cities posted Mon Jan 10 2005 18:36:12 by Kkfla737
Cheappest Way To Get From YYC To HEL posted Fri Jan 7 2005 16:15:08 by Vio
Flight From HKG To AMS. posted Mon Feb 17 2003 16:49:01 by Vywh
KLM Loads From North America On 12june posted Thu Jun 13 2002 08:06:30 by FLYYUL
Best Carrier From MEL To AMS posted Wed Nov 14 2001 11:26:00 by Ms861
Flying From FCO To AMS posted Mon May 28 2001 18:20:29 by Cliperb777
LAN Cargo 777F Takes Live Hogs To AMS From YWG posted Wed May 27 2009 19:55:57 by ScrubbsYWG
KLM Embraer Fly Out Route To AMS posted Thu Apr 30 2009 08:55:27 by EcuadorianMD11