Rejection Help Please — Aviation Photography Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

Rejection Help Please

Johnsiebert From Germany, joined Sep 2007, 135 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 months 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 528 times:

hi all Wink please help me,
I got this one rejected, reason: dirty

i JUST removed the dustspots:

and got it rejected for: personal soft
the personal comment was: nose end soft

so should i appeal because they didn't tell me the soft reject reason during the first rejection? Doesn't that mean that not all screeners agree to a softrejection?

regards
John

visit my profile to find a link to my homepage ;-)

12 replies: All unread, jump to last

Viv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 2328 posts, RR: 20
Reply 1, posted (2 months 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 527 times:

Quoting Johnsiebert (Thread starter):
so should i appeal because they didn't tell me the soft reject reason during the first rejection?

Not without sharpening the nose, if you can.

Viv

Johnsiebert From Germany, joined Sep 2007, 135 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 months 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 518 times:

ok
so sharpen the nose and then upload again?

visit my profile to find a link to my homepage ;-)

Viv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 2328 posts, RR: 20
Reply 3, posted (2 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 511 times:

Quoting Johnsiebert (Reply 2):
so sharpen the nose and then upload again?

If you are so inclined.

Viv

Johnsiebert From Germany, joined Sep 2007, 135 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 508 times:

LOL am i inclined?, i dont see a reason why not upload again, they didnt tell me the reason soft during the first rejection.

visit my profile to find a link to my homepage ;-)

Viv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 2328 posts, RR: 20
Reply 5, posted (2 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 503 times:

Quoting Johnsiebert (Reply 4):
they didnt tell me the reason soft during the first rejection.

Rejections do not normally list all defects, just the most obvious one(s).

Viv

EZEIZA From Argentina, joined Aug 2004, 3021 posts, RR: 19
Reply 6, posted (2 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 501 times:

Quoting Viv (Reply 5):
Rejections do not normally list all defects, just the most obvious one(s).

Which is one of the great problems IMO. All rejection reasons should be listed. It would avoid a few headaches Wink

Carp aunque ganes o pierdas ...

Viv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 2328 posts, RR: 20
Reply 7, posted (2 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 501 times:

Quoting EZEIZA (Reply 6):
All rejection reasons should be listed

In a perfect world, yes. But it is not - and they are not.

Viv

Ptrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 2639 posts, RR: 13
Reply 8, posted (2 months 2 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 482 times:

Quoting EZEIZA (Reply 6):
All rejection reasons should be listed.

That sounds logical, but there's a downside to it. A large proportion of rejected shots are probably never re-uploaded. So, a lot of the extra work for the screeners would be futile. And when a shot is re-uploaded, the screeners will always need to check it all over again, anyway, because it may have other defects than the rejected version.

Peter Smile

The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)

Jorge1812 From Germany, joined Apr 2004, 2808 posts, RR: 7
Reply 9, posted (2 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 443 times:

Hi.
To jump in.

My third rejection on this one
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...0906_OK-TVC_738_QS_250808__332.jpg

and the second time for contrast. Any direction for me how much to add.

Thanks!

georg

jet737.de

Cpd From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 107 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (2 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 421 times:

Quoting Jorge1812 (Reply 9):
Hi.
To jump in.

My third rejection on this one
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...0906_OK-TVC_738_QS_250808__332.jpg

and the second time for contrast. Any direction for me how much to add.

Thanks!

georg

Sorry - but motive there - the wheels are partially obscured by the ground. Based on previous rejections seen here, I doubt this would escape motive.

Jorge1812 From Germany, joined Apr 2004, 2808 posts, RR: 7
Reply 11, posted (2 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 409 times:

Quoting Cpd (Reply 10):
Sorry - but motive there - the wheels are partially obscured by the ground. Based on previous rejections seen here, I doubt this would escape motive.

But in that case I would think that a motive rejection at first is a nice hint

1. oversharpened
2. contrast
3. contrast

would be waste of time if it gets another rejection for motive.

georg

jet737.de

Jorge1812 From Germany, joined Apr 2004, 2808 posts, RR: 7
Reply 12, posted (2 months 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 291 times:

Finally the 4th version made it in

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

jet737.de

Top Of Page

Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics: