LHSebi From Germany, joined Jan 2004, 1049 posts, RR: 9 Reply 2, posted (9 years 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2296 times:
This is from their website, so it looks like you're not far off in saying a stock trading website:
"DebtTraders is a specialist in distressed and high yield bonds globally. Through offices in all major regions of the world, we research and trade debt instruments with institutional clients, 24 hours a day."
It seems to me to be quite commercial, but I can't seem to figure out why they would use any airliner photos there. By the way, there are about 7 or 8 other EVA air photos from a.net on there too, if you just scroll down, and click on the link to the other tail numbers. Other photographers might want to have a look! Anyhow, good luck!
I guess that's what happens in the end, you start thinking about the beginning.
Tappan From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 1538 posts, RR: 46 Reply 7, posted (9 years 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2171 times:
THIS COMPANY KNOWS ABOUT $$$$$$$
This is not a non profit or a kid's Flight Sim.....
Let 'em know we are not going to be used like they use their customers
P.S The CEO probably makes more $ in one year than 30 of us do.....
BIGDEN From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 147 posts, RR: 2 Reply 8, posted (9 years 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 2148 times:
"class action" with combined ripped off photographers against the company should have some impact, or at least force a quick settlement. Get some input from an attorney who is a member here. GOOD LUCK!
Wietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 57 Reply 10, posted (9 years 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 2137 times:
This is major. I have spotted a lot of images taken from A.net. Some have been edited (planes in a white sky), others haven't been edited. I think an inventory of all images involved could be made, but it would take A LOT of time.
Jaspike From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2008, 1 posts, RR: 2 Reply 16, posted (9 years 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1908 times:
I got an email back from them earlier, all images removed from the site. They apologise for their actions. They also said that they have not used the photograph I mentioned in my email (Wietse's) in any of their electronic or hard copy publications.